VULTURE

WESTERN ARIZONA

Sections 1,12 R8W, T5N; Sections 4,5,6,7,8, R7W, T5N USGS Aguila 15' Quad; and Sections 2,3,4,9,10,11,14,15,16, R7W, T5N USGS Vulture Mountains 15' Quad, northwest Maricopa County, Arizona. Previous to this study, the Vulture source was the only fully documented archaeological obsidian source in central Arizona (P. Brown 1982). The geology here is very similar to other mid-Tertiary sources in the region, especially Sauceda. A series of bedded ash-flow tuffs are punctuated with roughly circular rhyolite bodies and remnant domes that grade to perlite or vitrophyre toward the outer margins (P. Brown 1982:230). Surrounding the silicic volcanics is an alluvium that contains chunks of rhyolite and basalt as well as marekenites up to 10 cm in diameter. The nodules are found at least 20 km south and east into the Hassayampa Plain and perhaps into the Gila River system. Nodule densities near the perlite-vitrophyre are fairly low (<10 per 5m2), but the area is a known "Apache Tear" locality for local rockhounds.

The nodules exhibit velvet-like to water eroded thin black cortex. The aphyric glass ranges from a nearly opaque brown-green to nearly transparent. Some nodules are banded or cloudy, and one specimen was evenly banded with greenish and black bands. The nodules are an excellent medium for small biface production.

Much of this source falls within a large lithic (obsidian, rhyolite, chalcedony) procurement site AZ T:5:5(ASU) (Brown and Stone 1982). Here, as at all the marekenite sources, sporadic occurrences of bipolar reduction stations are common. The presence of cores and debitage is also sporadic, probably corresponding to the prehistoric location of nodules. Small areas, usually less than 1m2, exhibit 15 to 20 rejected flakes, angular debris, and bipolar core fragments. These bipolar reduction areas may be 5 to 50 meters apart. Brown and Stone's study indicated that only 10% of the artifacts were utilized (1982:82). The vast majority of the recovered materials were unused flakes (Brown and Stone 1982:82). This suggests that the nodules were 'test knapped' and those found suitable were removed. This pattern of bipolar test knapping and removal of desirable flakes and cores is common on all the middle to late Tertiary marekenite sources. The lack of utilized artifacts is also a common pattern. The main published work on this source is P. Brown's (1982) study, as well as Wilson et al. (1957).

Raw elemental concentrations for Vulture source standards. All measurements in parts per million (ppm).

SAMPLE

Ti

Mn

Fe

Rb

Sr

Y

Zr

Nb

Ba

1A 926.752 318.917 8675.981 146.997 41.876 19.464 138.951 24.074 425.508
1B 1060.539 389.617 8925.04 148.572 42.782 21.534 141.098 23.437 429.153
1C 744.456 321.355 7706.188 126.378 35.842 16.778 122.51 20.117 438.404
1D 823.254 320.13 8000.239 128.892 37.699 19.177 124.292 24.481 439.289
1E 1076.178 349.74 8586.77 145.127 39.468 19.531 137.061 24.771 438.872
2A 1049.756 344.814 8917.491 149.325 40.861 22.897 135.652 26.762 442.317
2B 1071.059 365.734 8828.509 151.306 41.676 18.237 139.561 24.764 434.788
2C 954.401 351.286 8269.957 137.154 40.121 17.212 134.269 23.908 420.63
2D 1040.394 341.383 8714.705 149.277 42.626 21.059 136.381 29.328 432.586
2E 1038.445 366.032 8658.13 141.121 41.889 19.862 135.563 28.64 406.925

This page maintained by Steve Shackley (shackley@berkeley.edu).
Copyright © 2001 M. Steven Shackley. All rights reserved.
Revised: 20 April 2004

Back to the SW obsidian source page.

To the Berkeley EDXRF Lab home page